Despite coordinated endeavors by traditional right-wing disseminators to criticize the protestors who are challenging the three farming laws by marking them Khalistanis, this point has discovered little prominence among the overall population. Then again, more individuals have turned out on the side of the farmers, putting aside the caste system and political associations. The protestors have since spread to different parts of the country, with the protestors impeding streets, highways, and rail line tracks, and restricting the development of individuals and merchandise, including the production of the farmers. An enormous number of Hindus from Punjab, whom the saffron party considers its elector base in the state, have strikingly dismissed the endeavors by a few BJP pioneers to intimate that farmers movement are exclusively associated with Sikh movement development. While consideration has stayed joint on the protest destinations on the Delhi border, the number of protestors is so huge that they expand profoundly into Haryana. The Rohtak bypass, 40 kilometers from Delhi, for example, is filled with many farmers, tractors, streetcars, and tents. The majority of the Sikh farmers present in the protest pushed the thought that Khalistan is a thought for which 40,000 individuals died, yet that is an alternate issue. This is the first-ever secular mass gathering and protest against the Modi government in the country. The protesters are pointing fingers towards Delhi, which is trying to distort the nature of protest and sit-in. The central government seems frightened that the protestors can shake the disruptive plan of the “Sangh Parivar” subsequently, they are naming Sikh protestors as the Khalistanis. They strive to communalize the protestor’s dissent, and to counter them, they subsequently kept bound to the Khalistan slur. The touch of the Khalistan movement was given to dispute the sit-in of the farmers, which is getting muscle day by day. It was rumored that it was the BJP’s and Prime Minister Modi’s agenda to swell the Khalistan chronicle with the sole aim of dashing the protest by farmers. The stance was clear with the loud roar in the skies of Delhi when the farmers chanted, “this is a protest of farmers, by farmers and for farmers.” But the worrying talks in the power corridors of Delhi and elsewhere are why these protests went out of hand? The main reason for the sit-in in the chilled winter of Delhi is that the laws passed by the lower and upper houses of India guarantee to give more opportunity to the farmers. The bills were completely passed utilizing the decision Bhartiya Janata Party’s parliamentary lion’s share, and without appropriate consultation with the key partners, for example, farmers associations and unions. Its main focus was to exchange outside state-assigned business sectors and private dealers to move, disseminate, and trade what farmers produce. Be that as it may, the farmers are uneasy for a few reasons. Firstly, over 85% of India’s farmers own agricultural land less than three acres of land. These farmers generally participate in resource cultivating and selling their overflows, when accessible, to private buyers. The normal pay of farmers has stayed low, at simply more than $1,000 per year, making them profoundly delicate to fears over market vacillations. And keeping in mind that there is a lot of variety inside this protest of the farmers, and they are not prone to profit by the enactment the public authority has declared. To add fuel to the fire was the delegated Dalwai Committee, which published its last report in 2018, suggested that the public authority ought to fundamentally change India’s cultivating strategy environment from a stockpile centered, government-drove coordinated that would request the centered and market-based policy. Such a retreat would additionally decrease public interest in the farming sector. These farmers are additionally apprehensive that this changing approach of the climate and rising corporate force would bring about a deficiency of both land and work. This is the reason why the government’s treatment of this upsurge is counter-dynamic. The Modi government is dealing with it as it would deal with any worker’s organization fight. The typical stunts of evading, crash, and redirect have not worked. Efforts to isolate the development by supposedly getting non-existent farmer’s unions and associations to meet the Modi government have met with the ridicule which it deserves.